I begin to come up with an idea, something to right
about, an interesting point, so on an so forth. Then I immediately lose it.
This is completely awesome, makes writing so simple.
Do you remember, in kindergarten or preschool, nap time? I've never really understood why they would designate and implement an activity such as that for small children that only attend school for four hours anyway. Was it just so they were not complete brats? Everyone is cranky when not on enough sleep. Maybe the same rule should be applied to us too. Especially since ours brains at this age, don't develop near as quickly.
The younger the child, the faster the brain development. For this reason, teaching children two languages is much easier until the age of five, than teaching a teenager or an adult. The development of their brains are so great that they could, more than likely, sit in a room as long as a high school student and absorb two-times more information. Instead, they play, and get nap time.
I remember, in kindergarten, learning the alphabet in sign language. It took about a week. I also remember dress up, and painting. Besides some sort of motor skills, what does dress up do for learning development? If it was a way to teach kids to use their imaginations, boy did I sure fail that course. I look back, and really wish I would have learned something more. I was never really one that wanted to play. I wanted to get school over with. Now I want both, but can only have one. I can't have them both, so can I have nap time to compensate?
Nap time would be highly beneficial for high school students. Information is retained better, and for a longer period of time whence something is taught or read or learned before a brief napping period. Imagine how much smarter we would all be. Imagine how much more rested we would all be, especially considering most teenagers are not well rested. So, being beneficial to both our health and our education, we should have nap time.
Do you remember, in kindergarten or preschool, nap time? I've never really understood why they would designate and implement an activity such as that for small children that only attend school for four hours anyway. Was it just so they were not complete brats? Everyone is cranky when not on enough sleep. Maybe the same rule should be applied to us too. Especially since ours brains at this age, don't develop near as quickly.
The younger the child, the faster the brain development. For this reason, teaching children two languages is much easier until the age of five, than teaching a teenager or an adult. The development of their brains are so great that they could, more than likely, sit in a room as long as a high school student and absorb two-times more information. Instead, they play, and get nap time.
I remember, in kindergarten, learning the alphabet in sign language. It took about a week. I also remember dress up, and painting. Besides some sort of motor skills, what does dress up do for learning development? If it was a way to teach kids to use their imaginations, boy did I sure fail that course. I look back, and really wish I would have learned something more. I was never really one that wanted to play. I wanted to get school over with. Now I want both, but can only have one. I can't have them both, so can I have nap time to compensate?
Nap time would be highly beneficial for high school students. Information is retained better, and for a longer period of time whence something is taught or read or learned before a brief napping period. Imagine how much smarter we would all be. Imagine how much more rested we would all be, especially considering most teenagers are not well rested. So, being beneficial to both our health and our education, we should have nap time.
No comments:
Post a Comment